Аннотации:
Nowadays the metalanguage of modern gender
linguistics is in the stage of developing as a number of its terms do not have the
monosemantic meaning. The feminitive (female nomination) is one of them. The aim
of the article is to study the approaches of modern researchers to interpret the term
feminitive. Different types of the meaning of this term, which were suggested by
linguists in different research periods, are considered in this analysis. Common and
different features of the term feminitive interpretation are distinguished, which are
stated not only in modern dictionaries of terms, but also in research papers. This
analysis gives us an opportunity to consider that there are narrow and broad
approaches to the comprehension of the term feminitive. The term feminitive is a
female naming unit, which is marked as the feminine gender in grammar, being the
alternative to the notions of the masculine gender (Ukr. uchytel` – uchytel`ka). It is
considered to be the most widespread narrow comprehension.
Some scientists narrow the meaning of this term yet more. They suppose that
this notion emphasizes a group of words, which possibly show masculine and
feminine genders at the same time. They are also marked as the feminine gender in
the language structure (Ukr. syrota, nevdakha). These nouns are determined to be
common ones. However, the notion feminitive is much broader and includes lexical,
word-forming, morphemic, syntactical and phraseological units of the language
system.
Описание:
Матеріали другої Міжнародної наукової конференції (7-8 квітня 2022 року) АРГУМЕНТИ СУЧАСНОЇ
ФІЛОЛОГІЇ. ОБРАЗ ЖІНКИ : «ЖІНОЧЕ», «ФЕМІНІСТСЬКЕ», «ФЕМІННЕ». ХАРКІВСЬКИЙ НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ
ПЕДАГОГІЧНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ імені Г.С. СКОВОРОДИ