ТЕРРОРИЗМ, ЭКСТРЕМИЗМ И КСЕНОФОБИЯ

Abstract

Вивчення природи тероризму не достатньо розглядає проблему рефлексії на насильство і насильство, як рефлексію на навколишній світ. Основне завдання полягає в аналізі понять «ксенофобія» і «екстремізм» як причинно-наслідкова природа тероризму в Україні. Знання каналів поширення тероризму, груп ризику ксенофобських атак дозволяє виявити маніпулятивну технологію як свідомий сценарій з розколу країни. The study of the nature of terrorism distracts from the problems of reflection on violence and violence as a reflection of the surrounding world. The main objective is to analyze the concepts of «xenophobia» and «extremism» as the causal nature of terrorism in Ukraine. Knowing the distribution channels of terrorism risk groups xenophobic attacks reveals the manipulative technologies as a conscious script to split the country. Ukraine is now in the form of his world breaks on a range of «his» - «alien». There are several sides: - «Bandera» (territory of Galicia and the surrounding area); - «Donetsk» (Donetsk and Luhansk region); - «Crimeans» (the Crimea); - «Other» (here are due to the Jews in Odessa and others.). There is a «risk» that periodically are objects of xenophobia: • Roma (Gypsies). Due to the socio-economic, cultural and historical reasons, the majority of members of this ethnic group belong to the poorest of the poor. • Crimeans who now live on the peninsula of Crimea. It remains difficult position of the Crimean Tatars in Crimea, who were held hostage secret policy of the Kremlin. • periodically undergo stable xenophobia and Jews. Despite the fact that the history of the Jewish population developed immunity to such a relation, the physical assaults and attacks on information they are not insured; • There is also a new «risk group» may include legal or illegal immigrants to Ukraine. It is interesting that until recently, the term «bandera», which was peculiar to the inhabitants of the Western Ukraine, now acquired an entirely different connotation. In this case, mifotehnologiya here played the role of PR both within the Ukrainian state and beyond. Information confrontation, which used the term «banderovets» Russian media in a negative shade, led to an unexpected turn. The idea of protecting the state against foreign intervention and the way the defense of the Ukrainian land has picked up the rhetoric and propaganda of the Russian media, thanks to her, have created the modern national symbol. There was a transformation of the object «banderovets» in a particular area at a particular time, and that made it a timeless and spaceless concept at all. What previously was applied as a synonym for fascism turned into patriotism. Analyzing the types of characters such as myth, Knight, general, master, rebel loner immediately clear that the concept of «banderovets» fits any of the images. The study tested enough to ride the communication flows from the attack on Russian media and already build their own news reports with built-in definitions, there was a change in attitude not only to the concept of «banderovets», but also to fascist rhetoric in this context.